Sunday, December 3, 2006


Cervical Nodes

Variable size. Typically, as many as 75 nodes are located on each side of the neck. Nodes contain a sub capsular sinus below a prominent capsule, into which lymphatic fluid drains. This capsule is often the first site of metastatic growth. The fluid permeates into the substance of the node (composed of a cortex and a medulla) and exits through the hilum to enter more lymphatic vessels. These nodes are located between the superficial cervical and prevertebral fascia and, thus, are very amenable to surgical removal. The lymphatic fluid eventually enters the venous system at the junction of the internal jugular and subclavian veins. Many nodal descriptions exist today; Rouvière's is the classic model.

The occipital nodes are in the superficial group, which includes 3-5 nodes. This group of nodes is localized between the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) and trapezius muscles, at the apex of the posterior triangle. These nodes are superficial to the splenius capitis. The deep group includes 1-3 nodes. This group of nodes is located deep to the splenius capitis and follows the course of the occipital artery. These nodes drain the scalp, the posterior portion of the neck, and the deep muscular layers of the neck.

The postauricular nodes vary in number from 2 to 4; they are located in the fibrous portion of the superior attachment of the SCM muscle to the mastoid process. Postauricular nodes drain the posterior parietal scalp and the skin of the mastoid region.

The parotid nodes can be divided into intraglandular and extraglandular groups. The extraglandular parotid nodes are located outside but adjacent to the parotid gland, where they drain the frontolateral scalp and face, the anterior aspects of the auricle, the external auditory canal, and the buccal mucosa. Embryologically, the lymphatic system develops before the parotid gland, which surrounds the intraglandular nodes as it develops. The intraglandular nodes drain the same regions as the extraglandularnodes, to which they interconnect and then drain into the upper jugular group of lymph nodes. As many as 20 parotid nodes may be found.

The submandibular nodes are divided into 5 groups:

Preglandular, postglandular, prevascular, postvascular, and intracapsular. The preglandular and prevascular groups are located anterior to the submandibular gland and facial artery, respectively. The postglandular and postvascular groups are posterior to these structures. Differing from the parotid gland in embryological development, there is no true intraglandular node; however, occasionally, a node has been identified inside the capsule of the gland. The submandibular nodes drain the ipsilateral upper and lower lip, cheek, nose, nasal mucosa, medial

canthus, anterior gingiva, anterior tonsillar pillar, soft palate, anterior two thirds of the tongue, and submandibular gland. The efferent vessels drain into the internal jugular nodes. For the submental nodes, 2-8 nodes are located in the soft tissues of the submental triangle between the platysma and mylohyoid muscles. These nodes drain the mentum, the middle portion of the lower lip, the anterior gingiva, and the anterior third of the tongue. The efferent vessels draininto both the ipsilateral and contralateral submandibular nodes or into the internal jugular group.

The sublingual nodes are located along the collecting trunk of the tongue and sublingual gland and drain the anterior floor of the mouth and ventral surface of the tongue. These nodes subsequently drain into the submandibular or jugular group of nodes.

The retropharyngeal nodes are divided into a medial and lateral group, located between the pharynx and the prevertebral fascia. The lateral group, located at the level of the atlas near the internal carotid artery, consists of 1-3 nodes, which may extend to the skull base. The medial group extends inferiorly to the postcricoid level. This group drains the posterior region of the nasal cavity, sphenoid and ethmoid sinuses, hard and soft palates, Nasopharynx, and posterior pharynx down to the postcricoid area. Management of these nodes must be considered if any Malignancy arises from the mentioned drainage areas.

The anterior cervical nodes are divided into the anterior jugular chain and the juxtavisceral chain of nodes. The anterior jugular chain nodes follow the anterior jugular vein, located superficial to the strap muscles. These nodes drain the skin and muscles of the anterior portion of the neck, and the efferent vessels empty into the lower internal jugular nodes. The juxtavisceral nodes are separated into the prelaryngeal, parathyroid, pretracheal, and paratracheal nodes. Prelaryngeal nodes are located from the thyrohyoid membrane to the cricothyroid membrane and drain the larynx and the thyroid lobes. A single Delphian node is often found overlying the thyroid cartilage.

The pretracheal group consists of nodes between the isthmus of the thyroid gland down to the level of the innominate vein. Varying from 2-12 in number, these nodes drain the region of the thyroid gland and the trachea and receive afferent flow from the prelaryngeal group. The pretracheal efferents empty in the internal jugular group and the anterior superior mediastinal nodes.

The paratracheal nodes lie near the recurrent laryngeal nerve and drain the thyroid lobes, parathyroid glands, subglottic larynx, trachea, and upper esophagus. The efferent vessels travel to the lower jugular group or directly toward the junction of the internal jugular vein and theSubclavian vein. The anterior nodes drain bilaterally because the midline of the neck has no division. Treatment must be planned accordingly when a tumor is located in subjacent draining areas.

The lateral cervical nodes are divided into superficial and deep groups. The superficial group follows the external jugular vein and drains into either the internal jugular or transverse cervical nodes of the deep group. The deep group forms a triangle bordered by the internal jugular nodes,the spinal accessory nodes, and the transverse cervical nodes. The transverse cervical nodes, forming the base of the triangle, follow the transverse cervical vessels and may contain as many as 12 nodes. These nodes receive drainage from the spinal accessory group and from collecting trunks of the skin of the neck and upper chest. The spinal accessory chain follows the nerve of the same name and may account for as many as 20 nodes. This chain receives lymph from the occipital, postauricular, and suprascapular nodes and from the posterior aspect of the scalp, nape of the neck, lateral aspect of the neck, and the shoulder.

The internal jugular chain consists of a large system covering the anterior and lateral aspects of the internal jugular vein, extending broadly from the digastric muscle superiorly to the subclavian vein inferiorly. As many as 30 of these nodes may exist, and they have beenarbitrarily divided into upper, middle, and lower groups. The efferents of these nodes eventually pass into the venous system via the thoracic duct on the left and multiple lymphatic channels on the right. These nodes drain all the other groups mentioned. Direct efferents may be present from the nasal fossa, pharynx, tonsils, external and middle ear, Eustachian tube, tongue, palate, laryngopharynx, major salivary glands, thyroid, and parathyroid glands. Although fairly consistent, these drainage patterns are subject to alteration with malignant involvement or after radiotherapy. In such cases, rerouting is possible, with metastases arising in unusual sites.Metastases have also been shown to skip first-echelon nodes and manifest in the lower internal jugular group.

The most widely accepted terminology was originally described by a group of head and necksurgeons at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Hospital. This classification uses neck levels or zones and divides each side of the neck into 6 separate regions. Level I is bordered by the body of the mandible, anterior belly of the contralateral digastric muscle, and anterior and posterior bellies of the ipsilateral digastric muscle. Two nodal subgroups are found. The submental group (Ia) is found in the submental triangle (anterior belly of the digastric muscles and the hyoid bone), and the submandibular group (Ib) is found within the submandibular triangle (anterior and posterior bellies of the digastric muscle and the body of the mandible).

The nodes found in level II are located around the upper third of the internal jugular vein, extending from the level of the carotid bifurcation inferiorly to the skull base superiorly. The lateral boundary is formed by the posterior border of the SCM muscle; the medialboundary is formed by the stylohyoid muscle. Two subzones are also described; nodes located anterior to the spinal accessory nerve are part of level IIa, and those nodes posterior to the nerve are located in level IIb. The middle jugular lymph node group defines level III. Nodes are limited by the carotid bifurcation superiorly and the cricothyroid membrane inferiorly. The lateral border is formed by the posterior border of the SCM muscle; the medial margin is formed by the lateral border of the sternohyoid muscle. Level lV contains the lower jugular group and extends superiorly from the omohyoid muscle to the clavicle inferiorly. The lateral border is formed by the posterior border of the SCM muscle; the medial margin is formed by the lateral border of the sternohyoid muscle. The lymph nodes found in level V are contained in the posterior neck triangle, bordered anteriorly by the posterior border of the SCM muscle, posteriorly by the anterior border of the trapezius, and inferiorly by the clavicle. Level V includes the spinal accessory, transverse cervical, and supraclavicular nodal groups. Level VI lymph nodes are located in the anterior compartment. These nodes surround the middle visceral structures of the neck from the level of the hyoid superiorly to the suprasternal notch inferiorly.

Evaluating neck metastases based on physical examination findings has been the classic method for patients with new tumors in the head and neck. The single most important factor in determining prognosis is whether nodal metastasis is present. Survival rates decrease by 50% when nodal metastases are present. Furthermore, the presence of cervical adenopathy has been correlated with an increase in the rate of distant metastasis. During the clinical evaluation, carefully palpate the neck, with specific attention to location, size, firmness, and mobility of each node. Direct attention to nodes that appear fixed to underlying neurovascular structures or visceral organs or that demonstrate skin infiltration. The description of each node becomes an important part of the medical record, which can be used to assess the response to treatment or the progression of the disease.

Unfortunately, clinical palpation of the neck demonstrates a large variation of findings among various examiners. Although both inexpensive to perform and repeat, palpation findings are generally accepted as inaccurate. Both the sensitivity and specificity are in the range of 60-70%, depending on the tumor studied. Because of the known low sensitivity and specificity of palpation, a neck side without palpable metastases is at risk of harboring occult metastasis, with the risk determined by the characteristics of the primary tumor. The incidence of false-negative (occult) nodes based on physical examination findings varies in the literature from 16-60%. Before the introduction of diagnostic imaging, particularly CT scan, clinical palpation was shown to be inadequate for detecting cervical metastasis. Soko et al reported that only 28% of occult cervical metastases were found by clinical palpation. Martis reported a 38% prevalence of occult metastasis based on clinical examination findings

Debate persists over the relative merits of imaging in the evaluation of the neck for metastatic disease. Studies that correlate radiologic and histopathologic findings show that early microscopic metastases can be present in nodes smaller than 10 mm that demonstrate no stigmata of neoplasia (i.e., central necrosis, extracapsular spread). Evidence of early metastatic disease in clinically occult nodes is minimal and may evade the efforts of the pathologist and radiologist.

Ultrasound :

Ultrasound is reported superior to clinical palpation for detecting lymph nodes and metastases. The advantages of ultrasound over other imaging modalities are price, low patient burden, and possibilities for follow-up.

Sonographs of metastatic lymph node disease characteristically find enlargement with a spherical shape. Commonly, nodes are hypo echoic, with a loss of hilar definition. In cases of extranodal spread with infiltrative growth, the borders are poorly defined. Common findings of metastases from squamous cell carcinoma are extranodal spread and central necrosis together with liquid areas in the lymph nodes. Lymph node metastases from malignant melanoma and papillary thyroid carcinoma have a nonechoic appearance that mimics a cystic lesion. Sonography also is useful for assessing invasion of the carotid artery and jugular vein. Because lymph nodes of borderline size cannot be reliably diagnosed using ultrasound alone, ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and cytologic examination of the nodes in question can be easily performed. The result of the aspirate examination depends on the skill of the ultrasonographer and the quality of the specimen (ie, harboring an adequate number of representative cells). Using this technique, most studies report that a sensitivity of up to 70% can be obtained for the N0 neck.

CT scans

Since its debut in the 1970s, CT scans have been an invaluable tool in all fields of medicine, including the evaluation of head and neck cancer. Since the advent of high-resolution systems and specific contrast media, fine-cut CT scanning has allowed the detection of pathological cervical nodes of smaller size that may be missed by clinical examination. CT scanning is now used routinely for the preoperative evaluation of the neck because, presumably, it helps decrease the incidence of occult cervical Lymphadenopathy. Introduced in 1998, multiple-spiral CT scanning promises further improvement of temporal and spatial resolution (in the longitudinal axis). This technique permits rapid scanning of large volumes of tissue during quiet breathing. The volumetric helical data permit optical multiplanar and 3-dimensional reconstructions. Improvement of the assessment of tumor spread and lymph node metastases in arbitrary oblique planes is another advantage of the spiral technique.

Criteria for the identification of questionable nodes are also evolving as technology advances. Central necrosis remains the most specific finding suggestive of nodal involvement, but its absence does not exclude metastasis. Unfortunately, metastasis is usually quite rare or not visible in small lymph nodes, where detection would be crucial. Because of the higher imaging resolution, various studies have reduced the traditional values of 10-15 mm for a node to be suggestive. Many authors have proposed a minimal axial diameter of 11 mm for the submandibular triangle and 10 mm for the rest of the neck. Other criteria include the presence of groups of 3 or more borderline nodes and the loss of tissue planes.

Magnetic resonance imaging

The value of MRI is its excellent soft tissue resolution. MRI has surpassed CT scanning as the preferred study in the evaluation of cancer at primary sites such as the base of the tongue and the salivary glands. The sensitivity of MRI exceeds that of clinical palpation in detecting occult cervical lymphadenopathy. Size, the presence of multiple nodes, and necrosis are criteria shared by CT scanning and MRI imaging protocols. Most reports indicate that CT scanning still has an edge over MRI for detecting cervical nodal involvement. Advances in MRI technology (eg, fast spin-echo imaging, fat suppression) have not yet surpassed the capacity of CT scanning to identify lymph nodes and to define nodal architecture. Central necrosis, as evaluated by unenhanced T1- and T2-weighted images, has been shown to provide an overall accuracy rate of 86-87% compared with CT scanning, which has an accuracy rate of 91-96%. The use of newerContrast media, especially supramagnetic contrast media agents, hopefully will improve the sensitivity of MRI.

Positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography

Some studies have demonstrated that positron emission tomography may be able to detect nodal metastases in lymph nodes that are negative for disease based on CT scan or MRI findings. Single-photon emission computed tomography imaging with fluorodeoxyglucose or thallium also reportedly detects nodal metastases. The use of positron emission tomography in combination with immunoimaging using monoclonal antibodies might further enhance accuracy.

None of the currently available imaging techniques can help depict small tumor deposits inside lymph nodes. Characteristics of metastatic lymph nodes that can be depicted are the size and presence of noncontrast-enhancing parts inside metastatic lymph nodes caused by tumor necrosis, tumor keratinization, or cystic areas inside the tumor. Only rarely does tumoral tissue enhance more than reactive lymph node tissue; in these rare cases, the tumor can be visualized within a reactive lymph node.

Patients who need an evaluation for a possible nodal malignancy require a comprehensive multidisciplinary evaluation of all potential sites of drainage to that node to identify its primary source. This includes a thorough evaluation of potential primary sites using endoscopic techniques. When appropriate, include laryngoscopy, esophagoscopy, bronchoscopy, and examination of the nasopharynx. If no primary source is identified, taking blind mucosal biopsy samples of the most likely head and neck subsites is essential. Complete documentation of nodal characteristics by clinical examination and palpation guide the examiner in using adjunctive radiological tools to exclude occult nodal metastasis


Chen Z, Malhotra PS, Thomas GR, et al: Expression of proinflammatory and proangiogenic cytokines in patients with head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res 1999 Jun; 5(6): 1369-79[Medline].

Curtin HD, Ishwaran H, Mancuso AA, et al: Comparison of CT and MR imaging in staging of neck metastases. Radiology 1998 Apr; 207(1): 123-30[Medline].

Haor SP, Ng SH: Magnetic resonance imaging versus clinical palpation in evaluating cervical metastasis from head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000 Sep; 123(3): 324-7[Medline].

Merritt RM, Williams MF, James TH, Porubsky ES: Detection of cervical metastasis. A meta-analysis comparing computed tomography with physical examination. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997 Feb; 123(2): 9-52[Medline].

Safa AA, Tran LM, Rege S, et al: The role of positron emission tomography in occult primary head and neck cancers. Cancer J Sci Am 1999 Jul-Aug; 5(4): 214-8[Medline].

Southwick, HW, Slaughter, DP, Trevino, ET: Elective neck dissection for intraoral cancer. Arch Surg 1960; 80: 905-9.

Stacker SA, Caesar C, Baldwin ME, et al: VEGF-D promotes the metastatic spread of tumor cells via the lymphatics. Nat Med 2001 Feb; 7(2): 186-91[Medline].

Van den Brekel MW: Lymph node metastases: CT and MRI. Eur J Radiol 2000 Mar; 33(3): 230-8[Medline].

No comments:

Post a Comment